Archive for May, 2011

Congress Rejects ‘clean’ U.S. Debt Ceiling

Tuesday, May 31st, 2011

The House on Tuesday voted to reject a bill that would let the heavily indebted U.S. government borrow more money without any strings attached. The vote was 97 to 318, with 82 Democrats joining 236 Republicans in voting against the move. Republicans say the vote shows the president that Congress is unwilling to increase the debt ceiling unless the White House accepts deep cuts in federal spending. Conservatives say they are serious about slashing massive U.S. debt levels.

The bill proves “to the American people, the financial markets and the administration that we are serious about tackling our debt and deficit problems,” said Rep. Dave Camp, R-Mich., chairman of the powerful House Ways and Means Committee.

The federal government reached the current debt ceiling of $14.3 trillion in mid-May, but the Treasury says it can keep the U.S. from defaulting on its debt until early August. The Republican measure under consideration was written as a “clean” bill without any conditions. It would have raised the limit on how much the government can borrow by $2.4 trillion to $16.7 trillion. By comparison, the debt ceiling stood at $9.8 trillion before the last recession began in 2007, and it was just $5.95 trillion one decade ago.

Votes on the debt ceiling tend to be the subject of political maneuvering. Democrats have often voted against raising the debt limit during a Republican presidency, while Republicans have usually rejected an increase during Democratic administrations.

2nd Bailout For Greece Imminent

Tuesday, May 31st, 2011

German officials had argued private investors in Greece should share some of the burden in any new bailout, Germany is now considering lending additional assistance, even without private bondholders getting involved. 

Greece has been the subject of much concern for market participants in recent weeks as its struggled to pay back close to half a trillion dollar in public debt.  As late as last week, there were concerns the embattled country might have to restructure its debt, which would entail either pushing back the maturity dates on its bonds or having bondholders take a haircut.  Such a restructuring, analysts say, could pose a threat to companies that hold Greek bonds and other euro zone countries.

Greece got another bailout. We’re heading down a path of perpetual bailouts. Perhaps that’s the new normal? Perhaps it’s perfectly acceptable to expect that people that don’t pay their debts. I don’t think so. This decade might as well be defined by bailouts & austerity. Nothing is sustainable but everyone is excited to short term game in the system as people pile into and out of crowded trades.

European Union officials are in a race to get agreement on a second bailout package for Greece within a month, but face resistance from the borrower and lender countries. The race to secure a deal has raised the possibility of a further erosion of Greek sovereignty and of private sector lenders being asked for a degree of help in the process, if only to make new loans more palatable to taxpayers in Germany and Finland. EU officials are reported to be looking at a new €65billion package for Greece. It could involve a mixture of collateralized loans from the EU and IMF and extra revenue measures. Most controversially, the talks are understood to include an unprecedented level of external supervision of Greece’s privatisation programme.  “It would require collateral for new loans and EU technical assistance — EU involvement in the privatisation process,” one EU official told Reuters. Senior EU officials are understood to have held emergency talks with the Greek government over the weekend.

Yesterday, ECB executive board member Lorenzo Bini Smaghi warned that Greek debt restructuring or an exit from the euro would be a “death sentence” and would have a dramatic destabilising impact on the euro region.

Greece’s debts are expected to hit 150 per cent of gross domestic product this year, the highest in Europe, on top of a 10.5 per cent budget deficit. It has already begun retrenchment to reduce the deficit to 7.5 per cent this year, including €50 billion of privatisations. However, officials from the European Union and the International Monetary Fund, which put up the original €110 billion loan, fear the country will miss its fiscal consolidation targets. The government has proposed a further €6 billion of measures to bring the deficit down. He has previously backed privatisations but warned that increasing taxes would only push the country deeper into recession.

US Q1 GDP Down; Jobless Claims Climb

Thursday, May 26th, 2011

US Q1 GDP

U.S. corporate profits contracted in the first quarter for the first time in more than two years and the economy grew at the same pedestrian pace as previously estimated, government data showed on Thursday. First-quarter growth unrevised at 1.8 pct, below economists’ expectations for a 2.1 percent pace. The GDP Price Index was also unchanged at 3.8 percent, and the GDP Deflator was unchanged at 1.8 percent. Ongoing concerns about euro zone debt and the possibility of Greece restructuring its debt lingered however, were already keeping gains in check. After-tax corporate profits fell at a rate of 0.9 percent, the Commerce Department said, after rising at a 3.3 percent pace in the fourth quarter. 

Indications are that the sluggish growth tone persisted early in the second quarter, with retail sales lackluster and supply chain disruptions from the earthquake in Japan depressing motor vehicle production. The economy expanded at a 3.1 percent rate in the fourth quarter. Though overall GDP was unrevised, the report showed a bigger increase in restocking by businesses and slightly higher capital outlays, which helped to offset downward revisions to consumer spending. Business inventories increased $52.2 billion, well above the initially reported $43.8 billion rise. The change in inventories added 1.19 percentage points to GDP growth. But a decline in vehicle production so far in this quarter because of shortages of parts from Japan could cause a drawdown in inventories and weigh on growth in the April-June period. Motor vehicle output added 1.28 percentage points to first-quarter GDP.

QE3 possibility has grown ever so more imminent prior to 2012 Presidential Election. Growth is too sluggish.

Week of May 16 Jobless Claims

Signs of the economy’s struggle to regain speed were highlighted by an unexpected rise in the number of Americans applying for unemployment benefits last week. Jobless claims rose 10,000 last week to a seasonally adjusted 424,000, the Labor Department reported on Thursday. The prior week’s claims were revised upward to 414,000 from 404,000. The four week average of claims fell to 438,500. However, the rise in initial claims last week suggested the pace of hiring might be slowing. Economists had forecast claims slipping to 400,000. Last week marked the seventh straight week in which claims topped the 400,000 level.

Treasury Sells AIG Stake-Taxpayers Fleeced

Wednesday, May 25th, 2011

U.S. Treasury sold $8.7 billion worth of AIG stock. The shares were down 3.3 percent at $28.48 in early trading on the New York Stock Exchange. AIG and Treasury sold 300 million shares for $29 each on Tuesday. The sale by Treasury of 200 million shares reduced its stake in AIG to 77 percent from 92 percent, but it still has 1.5 billion shares left to sell to fully exit its investment.

Treasury is rushing to get out of  it’s position. Taxpayers will come out profitable but rather Break-even. This is absolutely absurd that taxpayers had provided $52 billion bailout held to support AIG over 2 1/2 years with a return to almost nothing. Who do I blame the politicians. Why do you ask, it’s because the Treasury is being forced to take drastic measures to support the over expenditures by the Federal Government. They had over 2 years to come up with a resolution and we’re still without an approved debt ceiling raise or budget cuts. Fiscal irresponsibility is running rampant on capital hill and this is unacceptable.

Congress get your act together and resolve the debt ceiling issue.

Spirit Airlines (NASDAQ:SAVE); Delays Airline IPO Take Off

Tuesday, May 24th, 2011

Spirit Airlines, a private U.S. carrier specializing in low-priced flights to Latin America and the Caribbean, the airline is offering 20 million shares at $14 to $16 each to raise as much as $320 million after it priced its initial public offering at $14-$16 a share on Wednesday, May 25, 2011. But before I continue I’d like to disclose just in the last hour as I write this article, the underwriters announced delaying plans of the IPO. It initially filed with U.S. regulators to raise up to $300 million in its IPO last September. Citigroup Global Markets and Morgan Stanley are lead underwriters for the offering, which will see Spirit list its shares on NASDAQ under the “SAVE” symbol. The airline, which calls itself an “ultra low-cost” carrier, keeps ticket prices low by unbundling items and services from its base fares. Spirit Airlines, sporting remarkably low unit costs as well as three consecutive years of profitability.

The company said it plans to use the IPO proceeds to repay debt and pay private equity firm Indigo. Major airlines have adopted similar structures in recent years and have managed to generate substantial ancillary revenue streams by unbundling services like bag checks. Chief Executive Officer Ben Baldanza made Spirit the first U.S. airline to charge for carry-on luggage, adding fees last year ranging from $30 to $45 for bags that must go in the overhead bins. Baldanza said the fee was to encourage passengers to check luggage instead, which would save 5 to 7 minutes between each flight as passengers tussle over storage space in the cabin. They’re perhaps the most aggressive among U.S. carriers on ancillary fees, but at the same time in fairness, they have significantly reduced prices associated with removing services. Every airline is charging for baggage fee with the exception of Southwest Airlines (LUV)

Use of Proceeds – SAVE expects to net $276 million from the IPO and intentds to use $124mm to repay debt, $1.6 million for management termination fee and the balance of $150 million for general corporate purposes, including cash reserves, working capital (including termination of the letter of credit facility), sales and marketing activities, general and administrative matters and capital expenditures, including future flight equipment acquisitions.

The largest shareholder with 59% of Sprit is Indigo, a private equity fund headed by Bill Franke, who was chairman and CEO of America West Airlines between 1993 and 2001. Indigo has invested in half a dozen ultra-low cost carriers worldwide, includeVolaris in Mexico and Mandala in Indonesia.Another private equity fund, Oaktree Capital Management, owns 34% of Spirit. Spirit’s top officer, CEO Ben Baldanza, was paid $820,990 in 2009 including $46,750 in stock.

About Spirit Airlines

Website can be found here

Spirit began operations in 1980 as Charter One, a Detroit-based charter tour operator that provided travel packages to entertainment destinations. In 1992, Charter One changed its name to Spirit Airlines and began offering flights from Detroit to Atlantic City. The carrier added destinations throughout the 1990s and added Latin American cities starting in 2001. It now serves 40 destinations. Spirit employs 2,300 people to run its EADS Airbus fleet. Florida-based Spirit operates more than 150 flights a day, but carries less than 1 percent of U.S. air passenger traffic.

Spirit Airlines Inc., the U.S. carrier that charges for carry-on luggage, is seeking to sell shares today at a discount to bigger low-cost airlines as rising fuel prices crimp industry profits and force higher fares.

Private equity firm Indigo Partners LLC bought a majority stake in Spirit in 2006. The firm also invests in airlines with similar models, including Mexico’s Volaris, Singapore’s Tiger Airways, Russia’s Avianova and Hungary-based Wizz Air. Oaktree Capital Management LP is the second-biggest investor. Neither firm plans to sell shares in the IPO, according to the prospectus.

Spirit operates a fleet of 35 Airbus SAS A320-family jets serving 40 cities, including Cancun, Mexico; San Juan, Puerto Rico; and St. Thomas. It also flies to cities where immigrants and their families often travel, such as Bogota.

The shares will trade on the Nasdaq Stock Market under the symbol SAVE.

Spirit’s planes average about 5 years of age, while Las Vegas-based Allegiant operates a fleet of 52 Boeing Co. MD-80 aircraft that are 21 years old on average. Allegiant has a market value of about $900 million.

Non-Ticket Revenue – Non-ticket revenue is a critical part of SAVE’s business model. Non-ticket revenue per passenger flight segment has grown by 600% since 2006.

Products and Services — SAVE provides low-fare passenger airline service primarily to leisure and VFR travelers. SAVE offers basic passenger airline service for a low fare combined with other optional travel-related products or services for additional fees. Fares do not require a minimum stay (e.g., Saturday night stay). Low fares are designed to stimulate demand from price-sensitive leisure and VFR travelers who might not otherwise have flown to destinations, due to the expense or inconvenience involved in traveling there.

Financials/Valuations

The Miramar, Florida-based Spirit would be valued at about $951.6 million, or 13 times 2010 earnings. That compares with 19 times for JetBlue Airways Corp. and 21 times for Southwest Airlines Co. Allegiant Travel Co., the closest to Spirit in size, trades at a multiple of 14.

Spirit is a niche airline servicing customers who pay for their own travel. Comparing the March 2011 quarter with the 2010 quarter: Revenue was up 27% to $233 million; Profit was up 12% to $28 million. The airline’s average base fare in the first quarter was $82, about 40 percent lower than Southwest’s. Spirit fills empty seats with fares as low as $9, then boosts revenue through fees of as much as $45 for carry-on bags that other U.S. airlines allow for free.

Spirit reported net income of $84 million on revenue of $700 million in 2009. In the first half of 2010, revenue totaled $335 million as the carrier lost $2.8 million, apparently as the result of a five-day pilot strike in June. Spirit reported net income of $1.4 million in 2007 and $33 million in 2008.

Spirit’s operating income as a percentage of sales was 15.9 in 2009, “among the highest in the U.S. airline industry,” according to the company’s prospectus. Last year, the margin dropped to 8.8 percent on fuel prices and a pilot strike. The airline’s cost for each seat flown a mile, an industry benchmark, was 8.77 cents last year, compared with 8.95 cents for Allegiant.

Annualizing the March quarter for price to earnings the ratios are: SAVE (8); ALGT (13). On a price to book basis SAVE is at a preimum to ALGT, the ratios are; SAVE (2.8); ALGT (2.4). On a price to sales basis the ratios are comparable: SAVE, (1.0), ALGT (1.1). Both SAVE and ALGT are priced at a premium compared to JetBlue (JBLU), Sky West (SKYW) and Southwest Airlines (LUV). The following ratios respectively are for price to sales, price to earnings, and price to book.

JetBlue Airways: 0.4, 152, 1.1
SkyWest: 0.2, -19, 0.6
Southwest Airlines: 0.8, 459, 1.4

In the past year ALGT’s stock peaked at $55.63 and is down 16% from the high to $46.79. SAVE is an interesting speculation on the IPO based on the P/E comparison and also on SAVE’s growth plan based below. BUT…..What about pressured margins which were shown in 2010 due to increased Fuel Costs.

Growth Plan — SAVE intends to add 33 new A320-family aircraft to a present fleet of 26 A319, seven A320 and two A321 aircraft. The new A320s are configured with 178 passenger seats as compared to 150 passenger seats per plane utilized by some of competitors, including JetBlue Airways.

Industry

Three main categories of passenger airlines operate in the markets in which SAVE competes: the traditional or legacy network airlines, domestic regional airlines and low-cost carriers.

(1) The passenger airline industry in the United States has been dominated historically by the traditional network carriers, which presently consist of American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, United Airlines and US Airways.

(2) Regional airlines, such as Air Wisconsin, American Eagle, Comair, Horizon, Mesa, Mesaba, Pinnacle, Republic and SkyWest, typically operate smaller aircraft on lower-volume routes than the network airlines and most low-cost airlines.

(3) Low-cost carriers largely developed in the wake of deregulation of the U.S. airline industry in 1978, which permitted competition on many routes for the first time and thereby introduced fare competition on those routes. The largest airlines based in the United States that define themselves as low-cost carriers include: Southwest Airlines, JetBlue Airways, AirTran Airways, Allegiant Travel Company, Frontier Airlines (now owned by Republic Airlines) and Virgin America. Southwest Airlines and AirTran Airways merged in May 2011, but continue to operate as separate carriers.

Dangers/Headwinds In Investing In Airlines – Fuel, Labor Costs

The U.S. commercial aviation landscape is dotted with failures, with 100 carriers filing for bankruptcy or ceasing service since 1989, according to the Air Transport Association, a Washington-based trade group that represents U.S. airlines.

Fuel surpassed labor as most airlines’ biggest cost last year, and accounted for 35 percent of Spirit’s expenses in 2010. Spirit’s focus on leisure travelers means it can’t count on demand from higher-fare business passengers, whose trips are paid for by their employers, to blunt any loss of vacationers who might be deterred by higher fares.

Six systemwide fare increases taken by the five biggest U.S. carriers in the first quarter didn’t overcome a 41 percent increase from a year earlier in the price of jet fuel for immediate delivery in New York harbor. The combined net loss for United Continental Holdings Inc., Delta Air Lines Inc., AMR Corp., Southwest and US Airways Group Inc. widened to $1.08 billion in the period from $978 million a year earlier.

Labor accounted for 22 percent of Spirit’s costs in 2010, with about half of its 2,300 employees represented by unions. Spirit’s operations were crippled last year by a pilot strike for about a week, when members of the Air Line Pilots Association walked off the job after three years of negotiations failed to result in a contract. It was the first strike at a U.S. passenger airline since Northwest Corp. mechanics had a stoppage in 2005. Spirit’s pilots, represented by the Air Line Pilots Association, staged a six-day strike in June after U.S.-mediated talks failed to bridge differences with management over pay, scheduling and benefits. The strike at Spirit was the first notable job action at a U.S. passenger airline since Northwest Airlines mechanics walked off the job in 2005. Delta Air Lines Inc (DAL) bought Northwest in 2008.

Spirit, which flies mostly between Florida and the Caribbean, is looking to raise funds for future plane purchases and to pay off debt as jet-fuel hovers at about $3.05 a gallon, near the highest levels since 2008. Gulfstream International Group Inc., the last passenger airline to hold an IPO, sold shares in 2007 and filed for bankruptcy last year.

A potential risk is that low-fare competitors such as AirTran and JetBlue continue to expand in the Caribbean and Latin America. One sign of their growth occurred last week, when both carriers announced nearly simultaneously that they would begin Tampa-San Juan, Puerto Rico service next year.

Most airlines would never even think about doing equity right now, with fuel at a three-year high and the outlook somewhat “uncertain” for the economy. As I scavenged through countless reports and financial statements on Spirit Airlines, a news wire hit ironically about Spirit Airlines. It read Spirit has delayed plans to price its initial public offering, an underwriter told Reuters on Tuesday, May 24th, 2011. I think Goldman’s upgrade on Oil and Gold targets spooked them. It’s ashame, regardless I’ve provided my full unbiased analysis as for maybe that one day when they do plan to begin trading on the exchanges, investors will readily have this information.

Yandex To Debut This Morning

Tuesday, May 24th, 2011

Russia’s Google Yandex (NASDAQ:YNDK) set to trade for the first time within minutes!!! According to a report released by WalStreet Journal

Shares of Russian search engine Yandex NV will begin trading Tuesday after its initial public offering was priced Monday night at $25 a share, above its expected range. The company sold 52.2 million Class A shares, raising a total of $1.3 billion. Yandex had originally set its expected price range at $20 to $22. The stock will trade on the Nasdaq under the symbol YNDX

Yandex, the largest Russian Internet company by revenue, is also its most popular search engine, generating 65% of all search traffic in a country that isn’t dominated by Google Inc. he company also operates in Ukraine, Kazakhstan and Belarus.

Consumer Internet companies both public and private have been drawing buzz in the U.S., especially in the wake of LinkedIn Inc.’s initial public offering last week, during which its shares doubled on the first day, the second-highest IPO performance of the year. That stock closed down 5% for the day Monday

Though Yandex isn’t in the same social media sector as LinkedIn, its dominance in a high-growth region for Internet users is attractive to investors.

I anticipate the exuberance to carry over into Yandex.

A little research on Yandek here

Market Correction Has Started; Set To Be A Volatile Summer

Monday, May 23rd, 2011

The DJIA 12,381.26 swallowed a loss of 130.8 points, or about 1.1%, to end south of the 12,400 level for the first time since April 19. What’s more troubling is that the blue-chip barometer finished beneath its 50-day moving average for the first time since March 22. This suggests a correction is in progress, thus all risk off. We shouldn’t see a massive correction, though market looks set to be choppy for the next several months. The S&P 500 Index or SPX 1,317.37 dropped 15.9 points, or 1.2%, to settle atop 100 day moving average for the first time since March 17.

Stocks spent the session swimming in red ink today, as heightened fears about the fiscal health of Europe weighed on stocks around the globe. In addition to downgrade drama plaguing Greece and Italy, traders fretted over potential austerity-related protests in debt-strapped Spain, as well as weaker-than-expected economic data out of Germany. Elsewhere, a ho-hum manufacturing report from China only exacerbated concerns of a speed bump in the global economic recovery. As a result, crude oil futures fell victim to a strengthening greenback, while gold futures defied the rising dollar as traders sought safety in tangible assets. Against this backdrop, all three major market indexes kicked off a historically rough week on the south side of break-even, while the CBOE Market Volatility Index (VIX) settled atop its 50-day moving average for only the second time since late March.

By the close, July-dated oil futures gave up $2.40, or 2.4%, to end at $97.70 an ounce. Meanwhile, front-month gasoline futures ended fractionally higher thanks to the shutdown of a unit at a Canadian refinery, while the front-month natural gas contract added 2.7% on forecasts for a heat wave across Texas and the Southeast. Gold futures, meanwhile, ended in the black, as debt worries in the euro zone amplified the malleable metal’s safe-haven appeal. Despite a strengthening dollar; gold for June delivery advanced $6.50, or 0.4%, to settle near a two-week high of $1,515.40 an ounce. On the other hand, July-dated silver futures finished a wishy-washy session with a loss of 18 cents, or 0.5%, to end at $34.90 an ounce.

Markets may have to correct and trade sideways through the summer until Japan the number 3 economy in the world, rebuilds after it catastrophic earthquake and regains it’s economic footing escaping it’s current recession. Until then trade with caution!!!

Next levels to watch are the following:

Firm Break above 1355 continues Bull Trend

50 day Moving Average  - 1323 NOW BROKEN

100 day Moving Average – 1313 SITTING ON TOP OF 100 MOVING AVERAGE —> NEXT TARGET IS LEVEL 3

Level 3 danger “Trend Line” – 1260 HITTING THIS LEVEL WILL MARK A 7.5% CORRECTION FROM MAY 2ND CLOSE OF 1361

200 Day Moving Average “Buy on the Dip Level”- 1234

Markets Feeling Pressure From Euro Debts

Monday, May 23rd, 2011

A weekend wipe-out of Spain’s ruling Socialists in regional and municipal elections raised fears of potential clashes over deficit curbs between central and local government as Madrid fights to avoid having to seek a bailout like Greece, Ireland and Portugal. As you will begin to notice, once political shifts take place, just like it has in Ireland and Greece, countries become in a political deadlock. Politics stands in the way rather than fiscal right doing. This comes at a heavy burden to tax payers and a countries borrowing initative.

Italy, which has the euro zone’s biggest debt pile in absolute terms, was hit by credit ratings agency S&P’s decision on Saturday to cut its outlook to “negative” from “stable.” Government sources said Rome would bring forward to next month planned decrees to slice 35 to 40 billion euros off the budget deficit in 2013 and 2014, in an effort to reassure and calm markets.

The premiums charged by investors to hold Italian and Spanish 10-year bonds rather than safe-haven German bunds rose to their highest levels since January, at 186 and 261 basis points respectively.

Stratospheric Greek debt yields rose still further — with 10-year bonds yielding more than 17 percent — amid uncertainty over a crucial 12 billion euro aid disbursement next month which is vital to meet 13.4 billion euros in funding needs, including debt redemptions, in mid-June and avoid default. The Greek yields do not reflect Athens’ real borrowing costs because the country is surviving on IMF/EU loans and trading in Greek bonds is thin, but it is a barometer of market anxiety about some form of debt restructuring. The Greek cabinet met to discuss new emergency deficit cutting measures to try to persuade international lenders to keep aid funds flowing, and convince investors the country can cope without a restructuring.

Visiting inspectors from the European Commission, the European Central Bank and the International Monetary Fund are withholding judgment on Greece’s compliance with its rescue program until they see progress on spending cuts, revenue increases and stalled privatizations. Among planned new belt-tightening measures were deeper cuts in public sector wages, more consumer tax increases and even the taboo issue of dismissing full-time civil servants. Greece has fallen behind targets and should set up a trustee institution for privatizations.

Market sentiment has darkened due to public disputes among the IMF, the ECB and Juncker over whether some form of debt “reprofiling” or “soft restructuring” should be brought into the policy mix. When the word of “soft restructuring” hit the financial headlines it scared markets after last week’s Eurogroup meeting. Any relief from bondholders was said to be on a voluntary basis. A voluntary extension of loan maturities, so-called reprofiling or rescheduling on a voluntary basis, would also be examined on the condition that it would not create a credit event. Mind you credit event is coined “Default”.

Market experts say any attempt to modify debt maturities while avoiding a so-called credit event that would trigger default insurance payouts and downgrades by ratings agencies would be likely to face legal challenge. Severe austerity measures imposed under the IMF/EU bailouts or to avert a bailout are taking a high political toll on governments across Europe.

You have “Arab Spring” vs “Europe Spring” (Europe Spring is Arab Spring minus the violent revolts for political change)

Spain’s ruling Socialists suffered their worst election result since the restoration of democracy in 1978, slumping to 27 percent of the vote, 10 percentage points behind the conservative opposition Popular Party.

Italy’s center-right government lost ground in local elections last week, and a weekend opinion poll in Greece showed that for the first time since Socialist Prime Minister George Papandreou took office in 2009, the center-right opposition New Democracy party has drawn level with the ruling Socialist party.

Russia’s Google Yandek (NASDAQ:YNDK) To IPO May 24th

Friday, May 20th, 2011

After LinkedIn’s euphoric IPO, lets move onto the next big Internet IPO scheduled for next week. Russia’s Yandex is set to complete the biggest internet IPO since Google, as investors wary of much-hyped social networks look instead for exposure to the fast-growing online advertising market. Russian search giant Yandex N.V. (NASDAQ:YNDX) is scheduled to price Monday, May 24th. The company plans to list on the NASDAQ. The offering has been said to be oversubscribed since day one of the company roadshow, and books are now rumored to be closing today (May 20). Yandex is offering 52.2 million shares at $20.00 to $22.00. Of the shares offered, 15.4 million are primary shares offered by the company, and 36.8 million or about 70 percent are secondary shares offered by selling shareholders, including Tiger Global Holding, Baring Vostok Private Equity funds, Roth Advisors, International Finance Corp., and current directors and members of management. Yandex’s offering, which seeks to raise as much as $1.15 billion, follows an initial offer by Chinese social-networking website Renren Inc. earlier this month. Net proceeds to the company of approximately $305 million are expected to be used for general corporate purposes, including investments in technology infrastructure. The lead underwriters on the offering are Morgan Stanley, Deutsche Bank, and Goldman Sachs. The $21 midpoint of the offering range would value Yandex at $6.75 billion. A Russian comparable is Mail.ru, which went public in November, raising $912 million. That would make it the biggest IPO by an internet firm since Google raised $1.67 billion in 2004.

About Yandex

Yandex plans to use IPO proceeds to invest in technology infrastructure, especially new servers and data centers, and for possible acquisitions of or investments in technologies, teams and businesses.

HISTORY/OWNERSHIP/BUSINESS

Yandex was founded by Arkady Volozh and Ilya Segalovich in 1997 as search engine www.yandex.ru for the Russian Internet users. It has since established businesses in Ukraine (yandex.ua), Kazakhstan (yandex.kz) and Belarus (yandex.by). Launched worldwide search at www.yandex.com in May 2010.

Main shareholders prior to the IPO: Baring Vostok Private Equity Funds with a 24.49 percent stake, Arkady Volozh (20.27 percent), Roth Advisors (6.58 percent), International Finance Corporation (6.27 percent), Ilya Segalovich (4.24 percent).

Main shareholders’ stakes after the IPO: Baring Vostok Private Equity Funds with 25.97 percent, Arkady Volozh (19.77 percent), Roth Advisors (5.95 percent), International Finance Corporation (5.51 percent), Ilya Segalovich (4.15 percent).

In autumn 2009 Yandex handed over a ‘golden share’ in its Netherlands-registered parent company Yandex N.V. to Russian state bank Sberbank, giving it a right to veto any future deal that would see a single shareholder acquire a stake of more than 25 percent.

Full-year 2010 revenue rose 43.2 percent to 12.5 billion roubles ($445.2 million) to U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). First-quarter 2011 revenues stood at $137 million.

Net profit rose to 3.8 billion roubles ($135.3 million) in 2010 from 2 billion roubles in 2009. First-quarter 2011 net profit amounted to $28.8 million.

The number of advertisers rose by more than 40 percent in 2010 to 180,000.

Yandex owns 65% market share (a/o March 2011) of all search traffic in Russia, well ahead of number two Google with 22% share. Their share of search traffic has grown from 58% in March 2009. The yandex.ru website is also the most popular online destination in Russia with 38.3 million monthly unique visitors, ahead of Mail.ru (35.7M), Vkontakte (31.6M) and Google (28.4M). Aside from being the leader in search, the company also claims to be number one in news, mobile applications, online advertising platform, maps, and market comparison shopping. It is number 2 in mail, behind mail.ru.

Yandex LLC became profitable in November 2002. In 2004, Yandex sales increased to $17M, which was 10 times greater than the company’s revenue just 2 years earlier. The net income of the company in 2004 constituted $7M. In June 2006, the weekly revenue of Yandex. Direct context ads system exceeded $1M. All of Yandex’s accounting measures have been audited by Deloitte Touche since 1999.

Yandex has grown revenue at a 59% from 2006 to 2010, to $440M in 2010. Adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net income were $217M and $140M respectively in 2010. The company derives the majority of revenue from online advertising. It currently has 58% market share in online advertising, with over 180k advertisers. Revenue at Yandex, most of which comes from advertising, jumped 65 percent in the first three months of 2011 from a year earlier, to 3.89 billion rubles ($138 million), the prospectus showed. Net income increased 62 percent to 820 million rubles.

When comparing Yandex with Chinese peers, such as Baidu, Inc.(BIDU), the offering looks to be an attractive discount based on forward P/E estimates. A better comp, however, would be fellow Russian company Mail.ru, which completed its IPO listing in Nov. 2010, on the London exchange. The company went public at $27.70, and is currently trading at approximately $36. Yandex appears to be coming about in line to a slight discount to Mail.ru on a forward P/E basis, and more of a discount on a forward adjusted EV/EBITDA. The wildcard in the valuation for Mail.ru is that a large portion of the valuation comes from its minority interests in such companies as Facebook, Groupon and Zynga. However, the underlying business of Yandex is arguably stronger and faster growing than that of Mail.ru.

The Yandex offering also faces some risks associated with operating within Russia. There has continually been some concern about Russian political risk. However, it appears that investors seeking growth and exposure to the fast growing Russian Internet sector are willing to take this risk. The Yandex offering has been highly anticipated for the last three years, when the company’s intentions to go public were originally announced, and based on heavy demand for the offering it appears to be in line to be yet another successful Internet IPO. Who knows, Yandex could eventually become a takeover target for Google if the Californian giant struggles to grow market share in Russia.

Why Not To Buy LinkedIn (NYSE:LNKD) After IPO

Thursday, May 19th, 2011

LinkedIn (NYSE:LNKD) raised its price range by 30 percent earlier this week, and priced shares at $45, which was the high end of its range. That allowed the company, a professional management networking website, to raise $353 million in its IPO. LinkedIn shares opened at $83 to retail investors, up 84 percent from its issue price. It closed at $94.25 up more than 109 percent, rising to it’s highest to $120 or 170%. LinkedIn’s closing price now gives it a market cap of $8.91 billion. Putting that into perspective, the stock is now bigger than nearly 40 percent of the S&P 500. Yes, hard enough to believe it. They’re bigger than stocks like AMDNYSE EuronextCloroxTiffanyHershey,ChipotleAbercrombie & FitchU.S. Steel (X) and many more. Puzzled still? So am I. New investors will asking if a profit of $2.1 million in the March-ended quarter on revenue of $94 million is enough to justify this kind of market capitalization. LinkedIn is at $94.25, at 43 times earnings.

This is a prime target for Shorts, however not so fast. It can’t be shorted until after the first 30 days of trading. Technically you can short it after the first day but, it becomes still a little harder to borrow short. At IPO there are no shares to borrow to short, no puts to buy, no calls to sell. For rule followers, shares will become available to short the first day following settlement of shares traded today. But, not everyone believes in rules. Day traders on machines – like myself don’t worry about fail to deliver messages. Just keep requesting away. For options traders, it will take a few more days. According to a spokeswoman for The Options Clearing Corporation (OCC), options will start trading on shares of LinkedIn five business days after the IPO is listed or, about May 26th. Problem with these new issues is that you have to wait about a week. OVERVALUED IPO=Failure for long term investors.

http://blogs-images.forbes.com/ericsavitz/files/2011/05/Internet-companies.jpg

Reason why it took off as it did while Goldman Sachs and other owners listed on my previous report (here) sold off at $45. Telling of the short supply, the volume stands at roughly 30m shares, more than a three-fold turnover on the 7.8m share placement. One theory for the wild swing is that bearish investors got caught wrong-footed and were forced to cover in the aftermarket. The IPO offered just a “little sliver” of its stock. Adding to the heightened demand for LinkedIn’s stock is the small amount of shares being offered, 7.84 million. In comparison, Google went public in August 2004 by offering nearly 20 million shares. To be exact only 94.5 million shares outstanding.

All about supply and demand. That doesn’t even account for the secondary offering that will happen later this year. That “little taste” got the market stimulated, sending the stock price higher, as investors had long been hungry for anything social media-related on the Web. Being as LinkedIn is the first prominent U.S. social networking company to go public, investors were quick to pull the trigger.

The other four social media wonders are Facebook, Twitter, Groupon and Zynga — are still private. Investors will be looking to LinkedIn’s stock performance as a possible indicator of when these four may also look to go public. Bubble concerns: Even as LinkedIn shares surged, investors remain concerned about a tech bubble. At a $10 billion valuation, LinkedIn is trading at nearly 670 times last year’s earnings. As recently as spring 2009, LinkedIn valued itself at just $2.32 a share.

Who’s selling shares: LinkedIn itself sold about 4.83 million shares, and existing stockholders are selling about 3 million. LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman and his wife, Michelle Yee, sold about 115,000 shares. They still own more than 20% of the company’s stock — which is worth about $1.8 billion at Thursday’s closing price.

Who Benefits From Massive IPO

Banks and Underwriters

There was virtually no retail participation in the IPO, meaning that the $45 price from which the stock’s opening-day gain was measured didn’t paint a true picture of the gains available for the average investor. Big funds willing to take on the risk of a company stepping its toes into the public trading waters can buy shares in big blocks and always get first crack before the public. You get all the retail investors buying in after the opening because they didn’t get allocation, which means at the elevated price of $83.  Morgan Stanley, Bank of America Merrill Lynch and J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. could split underwriting fees of $21 million to $24 million plus proceeds of shares offered from the original sticker price of $32.

LinkedIn Wins. They had raised over $350 million to invest in it’s business and higher more employees

Employees Wins: Shares offered to employees as compensation for low salaries.

US Economy Wins: IPO raises much needed capital to reinvest itself and spur more spending to hire workers. Decreases unemployment

Social Media Industry Wins: For other Social Media that would like to enter the market have a bright future. GroupOn, FaceBook, Twitter, Zynga, & Pandora.

Who Lost After the IPO

One sizable LinkedIn investor, Goldman Sachs (GS), decided to sit out the secondary-market fun. Practically alone among big holders of the stock, Goldman decided to dump it all in Thursday’s debut, selling its entire 871,840-share stake at the IPO price of $45 a share. Goldman stands to make something on the order of $34 million by selling the LinkedIn shares at the IPO price, three years after it bought the shares. In mid-2008 LinkedIn was paying $5.56 a share to buy back stock from its chief technology officer, so it stands to reason Goldman’s per-share profit on this deal is around $39.

Wall Street messed up: If the LinkedIn underwriters had accurately priced this IPO, hundreds of millions of dollars more would have gone into LinkedIn’s coffers. At an IPO price of $90 a share, there would have been plenty of demand for a modest LinkedIn first day “stock pop,” and the company and its selling stockholders would have pulled down $706 million. Instead, they pocketed just $352.8 million. Most of the value is going to speculative investors instead.

Future IPO Potentials

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. already helped Facebook Inc., the giant of social media companies, raise $1 billion, igniting speculation about their potential relationship in a future public offering. One potential hurdle to that arrangement: Goldman reversed course and only offered the private placement to its non-U.S. clients.

Goldman, and Morgan Stanley, are expected to lead online coupon company Groupon Inc.’s IPO later this year, while Morgan Stanley will take the central role in Pandora Media Inc.’s planned offering; a February filing said the Internet radio company was seeking to raise $100 million. And Twitter Inc., the popular microblogging service, will undoubtedly also go public one day.

My WARNING to investors getting long at these levels – beware: the twitter stream today was rife with commentators comparing the similarities of the LinkedIn IPO to the 1995 IPO of Netscape. And that did not end well for longer-term investors of Netscape.