Archive for the ‘Technology Stocks’ Category

Apple’s iPad Enters Classrooms In Place Of Textbooks

Thursday, January 19th, 2012

Algebra 1

Apple has taken the World by surprise, first with the iPod, then the iMac, iPhone, and the iPad. Apple formerly announced today they will be revolutionizing the way the class is taught and read. Yes this is not a typo. They have disrupted an $8 billion market for non other than publishers of school textbooks. Truly aspiring and amazing. For the first time in America’s educational history, a technology company (other than ahhhmmm Microsoft and IBM) will make learning more interactive and less strenuous on the back. The iPad will carry 100′s of books by the palm of one’s hand!!! Introducing an entirely new kind of textbook that’s dynamic, current, engrossing, and truly interactive. A textbook created by publishers using a new authoring tool from Apple. A textbook brought to life by iPad. Currently 1.5 million iPads are in use in education. iBooks 2 will be available as a free app on the iPad, starting Thursday. iPads absolutely have a place in the classroom. It’s just a matter of finding a balance. Now how do we get a student to stop surfing for boobs on the iPad?

For hundreds of years, textbooks have put a world of knowledge in the hands of students. But while the way people learn has changed dramatically, the traditional textbook has stayed the same. Paper textbooks are expensive to produce and expensive for schools to buy. Which is why schools are forced to use a book for several years to make the finances work. But information changes so quickly that some textbooks are out of date almost before they’re published. And as books are passed along from one student to the next, they get more highlighted, dog-eared, tattered, and worn. It’s no secret that paper textbooks are heavy. But what you may not know is that backpack weight is an increasing problem among kids. Studies show that heavy backpacks can lead to both chronic back pain and poor posture — and many kids are carrying a quarter of their body weight in textbooks.

Created with iBooks Author, textbooks by top K-12 publishers McGraw-Hill and Pearson Education, as well as educational content from E.O. Wilson, are available today from the iBookstore on any iPad. And textbooks from Houghton Mifflin Harcourt are coming soon. Apple and the book publishers have reached an agreement to price most textbooks at $14.99 or less.

Features

Highlighting and Note-Taking

Use a finger as a highlighter when reading any textbook in iBooks. Just swipe over text and it’s highlighted. Tap a highlighted section and a palette appears. Change colors, switch to underlining, or add a note instantly. Then switch to the Notes view to see all your notes and highlights organized in one place, making it a cinch to search or go back to the highlighted sections of the book.

Study Cards

All your notes and highlights automatically appear on study cards. Flip them over and find the definition of a glossary term or the note attached to the highlighted passage. Choose which highlight colors to review, and include chapter vocabulary from the glossary — automatically. To make sure you really know your stuff, you can shuffle your cards to study.

Textbooks and iTunes U

Educators can include iBooks textbooks in the complete courses they create for the new iTunes U. And the textbooks work seamlessly with the iTunes U app for iPad. For example, students can tap the name of the book in the assignment list to start reading it right away, and notes they take in iBooks will appear along with the other course notes in the iTunes U app.

Eastman Kodak Declares Chapter 11

Thursday, January 19th, 2012

Eastman Kodak (NYSE:EK) has filed for bankruptcy but it grabbed a $950 million,18-month credit facility from Citigroup (NYSE:C) that will allow it keep operating during Chapter 11 and pay its 17,000 workers. While the 130-year-old photographic company had been a pioneer with the hand-held camera and assisted in the first pictures from the moon, it could not find its place in modern technology and was unable to take advantage of its patented technology. The American icon had tried a number of turnaround strategies and cost-cutting efforts in recent years, but the company — which since 2004 has reported only one full year of profits ultimately ran short of cash.

  • The Game ChangersHewlett Packard (HPQ) in the Digital Printing and home photo printing; SnapFish & ShutterFly (SFLY)- Low cost Internet Digital Photo printing
  • The Borders Group liquidated last year after having failed to gain a toehold in e-books, while Blockbuster sold itself to Dish Network last year as its retail outlets lost ground to online competitors like Netflix. Find out here on who could be next! This was predicted several years back by our very own ACE @ WallStreetGrand.

    As with many fading giants, Kodak’s demise took place over decades and was imperceptible at first. Kodak invented the digital camera in the 1970s, yet sat on the technology, fearful that filmless cameras would cannibalize its core business. Competitors such as Fuji, meanwhile, nibbled away at its market share, often undercutting it on price. By the early 2000s, digital cameras finally became affordable and commonplace, and film was out.

    All the while, Kodak tried to diversify, while its workforce shrank from 70,000 to fewer than 20,000. But most of those efforts failed to catch on, and the company could never replace its gargantuan film business. A Chapter 11 reorganization may now allow Kodak to restructure its business around printers, certain types of software, and commercial packaging, while selling hundreds of valuable patents to raise money and position itself for the future.

    Eastman Kodak Co., which filed for bankruptcy Thursday, has hired Lazard as an adviser along with FTI Consulting and Sullivan & Cromwell. If you think you’re seeing Lazard’s name an awful lot these days, you’re not imagining it. Lazard is also advising in the bankruptcy of Twinkie maker Hostess Brands Inc., and Lazard is advising the Allied Pilots Association in its negotiations with the bankrupt parent company of American Airlines. In the U.K., it’s helping the Royal Bank of Scotland PLC with the disposal of some of its assets. Of course it’s not just companies that are going bankrupt these days. Lazard, which has a strong sovereign practice, is also advising the governments of Greece and Portugal. Most recently it advised EDP-Energias de Portugal SA on its $3.51 billion deal with China Three Gorges Corp. It’s also advising governments in more obscure locales such as Mauritania and Gabon, according to a company filing.

    Stock Watch Of The Evening 1-11-12

    Wednesday, January 11th, 2012

    This evening we are launching for the first time, video log of ACE’s stock picks. Stocks have beaten down the last several months which provides a great opportunity to make tons of money. Last night, I highlighted 2 stocks prime for takeoff. Sure enough they exploded to the upside. The 2 stocks TXT January 22.50 for .02 or equivalent to $20 contracts. It had 5800 in open interest. The stock was trading at $20.25 at the time. The option contract closed up today a whopping 750% to .17. Today’s high was .36 or 1700%. That’s amazing. The second one was AMSC. A small cap stock that has been beatendown to shreds. It had 31% short float of 51 million shares outstanding. This is a target of a short sueeze. Sure enough today began it’s squeeze. Expect more gains!!

    1-11-12

    How To Determine If A Stock Is Overvalued

    Wednesday, November 16th, 2011

    In the 1987 shareholder letter to GEICO stockholders, Lou Simpson, one of the most successful investors of all time, described what he looked for in a potential investment. They included “Think independently”, “Invest in high-return businesses run for shareholders,” “Pay only a reasonable price, even for an excellent business,” “Invest for the long-term,” and “Do not diversify excessively.” He also mentioned a concept that we have only briefly touched upon and that is the long-term treasury yield and how it has important implications in the valuation you should use to determine the relative attractive of a company.

    Let’s first understand what Overvalued means:

    A stock with a current price that is not justified by its earnings outlook or price/earnings (P/E) ratio and, therefore, is expected to drop in price. Overvaluation may result from an emotional buying spurt, which inflates the stock’s market price, or from a deterioration in a company’s financial strength. Potential investors do not want to overpay for a stock. A few factors they may look at is the price to earnings (P/E) ratio in comparison to the company’s peers, and the price to earnings growth (PEG) ratio to determine if a stock is overvalued. There are other factors as well that investors look at.

    The P/E ratio (price-to-earnings ratio) of a stock (also called its “P/E”, or simply “multiple”) is a measure of the price paid for a share relative to the annual net income or profit earned by the firm per share. The P/E ratio can therefore alternatively be calculated by dividing the company’s market capitalization by its total annual earnings. Unlike the EV/EBITDA multiple which is capital structure-neutral, the price-to-earnings ratio reflects the capital structure of the company in question. The price-to-earnings ratio is a financial ratio used for valuation: a higher P/E ratio means that investors are paying more for each unit of net income, so the stock is more expensive compared to one with a lower P/E ratio. The P/E ratio can be seen as being expressed in years, in the sense that it shows the number of years of earnings which would be required to pay back purchase price, ignoring inflation and time value of money. The P/E ratio also shows current investor demand for a company share. The reciprocal of the P/E ratio is known as the earnings yield. The earnings yield is an estimate of the expected return from holding the stock if we accept certain restrictive assumptions.

    The P/E ratio is defined as:

    \mbox{P/E ratio}=\frac{\mbox{Market Price per Share}}{\mbox{Annual Earnings per Share}}

    The price per share in the numerator is the market price of a single share of the stock. The earnings per share in the denominator depends on the type of P/E:

    • “Trailing P/E” or “P/E ttm”: Here earnings per share is the net income of the company for the most recent 12 month period, divided by the number of shares issued. This is the most common meaning of “P/E” if no other qualifier is specified. Monthly earning data for individual companies are not available, so the previous four quarterly earnings reports are used and earnings per share are updated quarterly. Note, each company chooses its own financial year so the timing of updates will vary from one to another.
    • “Trailing P/E from continued operations”: Instead of net income, this uses operating earnings, which exclude earnings from discontinued operations, extraordinary items (e.g. one-off windfalls and write-downs), or accounting changes. Note, longer-term P/E data, such as Shiller’s, use net earnings.
    • “Forward P/E”, “P/Ef”, or “estimated P/E”: Instead of net income, this uses estimated net earnings over next 12 months. Estimates are typically derived as the mean of a select group of analysts (note, selection criteria is rarely cited). In times of rapid economic dislocation, such estimates become less relevant as the situation changes (e.g. new economic data is published, and/or the basis of forecasts becomes obsolete) more quickly than analysts adjust their forecasts.

    For example, if stock A is trading at $24 and the earnings per share for the most recent 12 month period is $3, then stock A has a P/E ratio of 24/3 or 8. Put another way, the purchaser of the stock is paying $8 for every dollar of earnings. Companies with losses (negative earnings) or no profit have an undefined P/E ratio (usually shown as Not applicable or “N/A”); sometimes, however, a negative P/E ratio may be shown.

    By comparing price and earnings per share for a company, one can analyze the market’s stock valuation of a company and its shares relative to the income the company is actually generating. Stocks with higher (and/or more certain) forecast earnings growth will usually have a higher P/E, and those expected to have lower (and/or riskier) earnings growth will usually have a lower P/E. Investors can use the P/E ratio to compare the value of stocks: if one stock has a P/E twice that of another stock, all things being equal (especially the earnings growth rate), it is a less attractive investment. Companies are rarely equal, however, and comparisons between industries, companies, and time periods may be misleading.P/E ratio in general is useful for comparing valuation of peer companies in similar sector or group.

    Since 1900, the average P/E ratio for the S&P 500 index has ranged from 4.78 in Dec 1920 to 44.20 in Dec 1999, with an average around 15.The average P/E of the market varies in relation with, among other factors, expected growth of earnings, expected stability of earnings, expected inflation, and yields of competing investments. For example, when US treasury bonds yield high returns, investors pay less for a given earnings per share and P/E’s fall.

    Share prices in a publicly traded company are determined by market supply and demand, and thus depend upon the expectations of buyers and sellers. Among these are:

    • The company’s future and recent performance, including potential growth;
    • Perceived risk, including risk due to high leverage;
    • Prospects for companies of this type, the market sector.

    By dividing the price of one share in a company by the profits earned by the company per share, you arrive at the P/E ratio. If earnings per share move proportionally with share prices the ratio stays the same. But if stock prices gain in value and earnings remain the same or go down, the P/E rises.

    The earnings figure used is the most recently available, although this figure may be out of date and may not necessarily reflect the current position of the company. This is often referred to as a ‘trailing P/E’, because it involves taking earnings from the last four quarters.

    AN EXAMPLE OF AN OVERVALUED COMPANY (NFLX) COURTESY OF F.A.S.T. GRAPHS

    Graph Number One: Netflix’s Exceptional Earnings Growth

    With our first graph, we plot Netflix’s earnings per share growth (orange line) since calendar year 2007.  At the bottom of the graph you will see that earnings grew from $.94 in 2007, to $1.43 in 2008, to $2.05 in 2009, to $3.06 in 2010, and earnings are estimated, based on management’s most recent guidance, to be approximately $4.03 by year-end 2011. To the right of the graph we learn that Netflix’s average earnings growth rate since 2007 was an exceptional 39.2% (see red circle).

    Graph Number Two: Netflix with Price Correlated to Earnings

    With graph number two we add two very important lines.  First, we add the normal price earnings ratio that the market had historically applied to Netflix.  The normal PE ratio for Netflix calculated out to be 29.6, which is almost twice the normal PE ratio of 15 which is applied to the average company. On the other hand, Netflix’s exceptional earnings growth justified this level of premium valuation.  Nevertheless, starting in March of 2010 the black price line began to move above the blue normal price earnings ratio line before peaking in late July.

    We argued that this profitable enterprise had become dangerously overvalued. At the time of that writing Netflix was trading at $223.20 and it continued rising to over $304 by late July, effectively becoming more and more overvalued with each passing day. However, by the end of July the rubber began meeting the road and Netflix’s stock price was quickly reverting to the mean which it clearly reached on September 30, 2011.

    However, recent earnings guidance of a few quarters worth of losses has dramatically altered expectations of future earnings. Consequently, the market is attempting to establish a new and lower mean.  Time will tell where this ends up, however, most likely Netflix will go much lower.

    Avoiding the Obvious Mistake

    Based on the undeniable relationship between earnings and market price, investing in Netflix when it was so massively overvalued, even when expectations about future earnings growth were still very high, represented an obvious mistake that could have, and should have been avoided. Mathematically, it should have been clear that Netflix’s earnings and cash flow did not support their lofty valuation.

    Although it’s true that speculators and/or momentum investors could have bought Netflix in early 2011 and made a very high rate of return by summer, assuming of course that they then sold, that action cannot be properly described as investing. Later in this article we will discuss the difference between investing versus speculating more fully.

    Here’s a ANOTHER great website to use for graph ratio’s named YCharts.com

    Nasdaq:GroupOn To IPO At $20 Friday

    Thursday, November 3rd, 2011

    Groupon (NASDAQ:GRPN) priced its highly-anticipated 35 million share IPO at $20 per share, which was well above the expected $16-$18 range but below the $21 some had discussed in the market. The share size was increased by 5 million.

    The IPO price and raised share count suggests demand for the new issue was strong despite recent controversy amid a change in accounting methods, a slowdown in growth and an onslaught of competition.

    Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and Credit Suisse are leading the underwriting.

    Groupon has granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 5,250,000 shares of Class A common stock to cover over-allotments, if any.

    The total number of Class A and B shares that will be outstanding following the offering will be 632,803,328 shares. This suggests a market cap of approximately $12.7 billion if shares open at $20.

    The company posted revenue of $1.1 billion for the first nine months of this year, up from $140.7 million for the first nine months of last year. The company posted a loss of $308.1 million in the current 9-month period versus a loss of $77.7 million in the same period last year.

    Tribute To Steve Jobs

    Thursday, October 6th, 2011

    As you may all already know, a visionary was lost today. An innovator that shaped and changed the world we live in today. Steve Jobs passed this evening at a young 56 years of age. Wall Street Grand would like to dedicate this post to his passing as the world will mourn a father, a leader, and an inspirational individual that will always be remembered as the legacy of Apple. Steve Jobs made Apple the most valuable technology company in the world at $350 billion. Apple’s stock under Jobs: from $10 to $400.

    Steve Jobs is known as both mercurial and visionary, part rock-star CEO and part master salesman, a meticulous micromanager who can drive his employees to distraction — and one of the most important figures in American industry in the past half-century. After pulling his own company back from the brink of bankruptcy before the decade started, he almost single-handedly went on to save the recording industry with the iPod and iTunes. He revolutionized handheld devices and touch-screen technology with the iPhone. And he may well usher in a post-PC era of computing with his latest gadget, the iPad. “The resurrection of Apple is just the most astounding story that’s probably happened in business in at least a decade — you might be able to go further and say it’s a half-century,” says Roger Kay, president of Endpoint Technologies, a technology-industry think tank. “It’s on par with Thomas Edison and Alexander Graham Bell in terms of its total impact.”

    Jobs’s legacy stretches back several decades and includes the development of a few more groundbreaking innovations from his first go-round at Apple in the 1970s and ’80s: the Apple II, the Mac and elaborate computer graphics, to name a few. he has driven Apple to the top of the heap in technology. The company ranks No. 1 in the sector in market cap at $285 billion. That’s greater than longtime rival Microsoft Corp., whose value today stands at around $220 billion. Investors who plunked down $1,000 on Apple stock at the end of 2000 would have seen it grow to nearly $43,000 by the end of the decade.

    With Jobs’s mantras of putting the customer first and of desiring nothing more than to make great products ruling the day at Apple, consumers have been as delighted as investors. For the Apple faithful, the decade was a virtual orgy of technological wonderment, marked by marvel after marvel, alongside several inventions that rewrote the books. He also oversaw a big expansion of the company, hiring tens of thousands of workers as the company’s ranks swelled to more than 46,000 from about 8,500 at the start of the decade. Revenue skyrocketed. Today, more than 320 Apple Store locations span the globe, from the first stores in suburban Virginia and Southern California to Milan and Ginza.

    During the first decade of the new millennium, Jobs and Apple managed to thrive even when the rest of the country didn’t. Apple’s shares blossomed, pausing only when Jobs’s health was in doubt. While the stock trades at roughly 43 times its level of a decade ago, the S&P 500 has lost about 7%. Sales are up twelvefold from the end of 2000, surging from $5.4 billion for fiscal 2001 to $65.2 billion for fiscal 2010, which ended in September. Cumulatively, Apple has racked up more than $229 billion in total sales during the decade.

    Along the way, Jobs also ran another hugely successful company for much of the decade, Pixar Animation Studios. Pixar has had an uninterrupted string of blockbuster hits since its first release, “Toy Story,” in 1995, followed by such instant classics as “Monsters Inc.,” “Finding Nemo” and “Up.” Jobs sold Pixar to the Walt Disney Co. In 2006 and as a result became the entertainment giant’s largest shareholder and joined the Disney board.

    Those successes come at a price. To many observers, Jobs wrote the book on micromanaging, and that’s not meant as a compliment. There have been numerous stories over the years of his roaming the Apple compound in Cupertino, Calif., uprooting workers and aborting careers. In technology circles, Jobs’s mood swings are the stuff of legend and, in fact, led to his initial ouster from the company in 1985, according to Endpoint’s Kay. “When he’s in his Mr. Hyde role, he’s just insane,” Kay says. “Dr. Jekyll is the guy who’s making it all happen.” Adds Enderle: “He is not somebody [who] any one of us would want watching our kids, but, in terms of running the company, he’s excellent.” Jobs jealously guards both Apple’s secrets and his own privacy, remaining largely inaccessible, and he demands the same of the vastly expanded Apple corps.

    Steve Jobs Tribute Video

    Netflix To Expand Into Latin America

    Tuesday, July 5th, 2011

    Netflix (Nasadaq:NFLX) will continue to conquer the Americas: the online video rental service announced this morning that it will be expanding to 43 countries in Latin America and the Caribbean later this year. The news comes after endless hinting earlier this year from Netflix about its future expansion plans. Some had expected Netflix to enter the European market, but there it would have had to compete with the entrenched video service LoveFilm (which was acquired by Amazon earlier this year).

    Netflix said that its streaming video service would be headed to Mexico, Central America, South America and Caribbean countries, but it didn’t specify which countries in the latter regions. The company will offer English, Spanish and Portuguese language options in the regions (which is a big hint that it will be heading to Brazil as well). Just like with Netflix’s Canadian launch last year, the company will only offer streaming video in the new markets (I can’t imagine how Netflix would deal with physical discs in international markets). The announcement is yet another indicator that Netflix’s real future is in streaming video, although that has been clear even in the US for some time.

    I think that there is a lot of room for growth in these markets. The Latin American market has an estimated 215 million user base, compared to the U.S. with about 245 million. In a letter to investors in April, Netflix said it expected to have $50 million to $70 million in operating losses during the second half of the year due to its second international expansion.

    Once considered a friend to TV and movie studios, media conglomerates have fretted over the service’s popularity because it threatens traditional cable and satellite providers. The fear is that consumers will drop pricey cable packages — known as cord cutting — in favor of cheaper services offered by companies such as Netflix. Netflix has more than 23 million subscribers. By contrast, Comcast (CMCSA.O), the No. 1 U.S. cable operator, has 22.8 million subscribers as of March 31. Netflix shares were up 6.3 percent at $284.92 in late morning Nasdaq trading.

    Morning Markets Fall After Wednesday’s US Data

    Wednesday, June 15th, 2011

    U.S. stock markets fell harder Wednesday after economic reports had a regional manufacturing index declining sharply in June and consumer prices gaining 0.2% in May. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 105 points to 11,913. Standard & Poor’s 500 were down 11.7 points to 1,272.8.

    On the economic front, the consumer price index rose 0.2 percent in May, down from April’s 0.4 recent increase, according to the Labor Department. Food costs rose 0.4 percent, while energy costs fell 1 percent, the first drop in almost a year.

    Meanwhile, a gauge of manufacturing in New York State showed the sector unexpectedly contracted in June, falling to minus 7.79 for the first time since November 2010 from positive 11.88 in the month before, in another sign the economic slowdown could become more protracted, according to the New York Federal Reserve. Economists polled by Reuters had expected a gain to 12.50.

    In other economic news, the Mortgage Bankers Association said refinancing requests pushed home loan applications to their highest level in three months. The Mortgage Bankers Association said its seasonally adjusted index of mortgage application activity, which includes both refinancing and home purchase demand, surged 13 percent in the week ended June 10, the biggest percent gain since March. The MBA’s seasonally adjusted index of refinancing applications jumped 16.5 percent, while the gauge of loan requests for home purchases climbed 4.5 percent. Mortgage rates have declined for eight of the past nine weeks. Coming off of the Memorial Day holiday, refinance application volume increased significantly, as borrowers jumped to lock in the lowest mortgage rates since last November.

    Pandora (NYSE:P) opened this morning at $20.50 up 28.13% from $16 and still rising.

    Pandora IPO Prices At $16 Set For 6-15-11

    Tuesday, June 14th, 2011

    In a HOTT internet 2.0 IPO markets, Pandora (NYSE:P) for the third time increases it’s final IPO price set at $16.00 with a valuation $2.56 Billion. The company sold 14.7 million initial public offering shares at a level that topped a boosted price range of $10 to $12. The company last week increased the number of shares sold by one million and the price range by $3 in the face of strong investor demand. At $16 a share, the offering ended up raising $235 million, almost double the amount originally aimed for earlier this month. Pandora sold $96 million of stock, while shareholders, namely Hearst Corp., sold the rest. Pandora commands a market capitalization of $2.56 billion for a business that hasn’t made money and has no prospects of earnings at least through January. Pandora’s revenue has grown fast, but the company isn’t profitable on a net or operating basis. So far, the company hasn’t been able to generate enough revenue from advertising to offset its royalty expenses, and it warns that it expects to continue generating operating losses at least through fiscal 2012, which ends in January.

    Among Pandora’s venture capital shareholders, Crosslink Capital will own 21.9% after the offering, currently worth $560 million; Walden Venture Capital, 17.8% worth $455 million; Greylock Partners, 13.4% worth $343 million; Labrador Ventures, 8.1% worth $206 million; and GGV Capital, 4.9% worth $126 million. Other investors have included DBL Investors, Elevation Partners, King Street Capital and Selby Ventures, according to VentureWire records. The company has raised more than $50 million in venture capital. The stock is scheduled to begin trading Wednesday under the symbol P on the New York Stock Exchange.

    If prior internet stocks shows any signs of previous success such as last month’s, Russian search engine Yandex N.V. (NASDAQ:YNDX) priced above range and rose 55% on its first day of trading, while online professional networking site LinkedIn Corp. (NYSE:LNKD) doubled on its debut, we’re set another successful ride. At the open trade between 9:30-11:30 AM EST. I anticipate this stock to open at $25 to retail investors and hit $35-$45 range, resulting a 56% gain (from$16-Initial investors i.e. big money & funds), 40-60% gain scalp for retail investors.

    See details and analysis of Pandora here

    Disclaimer: I currently do not own this stock, but intend to trade it throughout the day

    Pandora (NYSE:P) Debuts June 15th

    Monday, June 13th, 2011

    Pandora Media Inc. increased the size and price range of its proposed initial public offering on Friday, upping the total potential take of the deal by 43% ahead of the streaming media company’s public debut, which is expected to take place June 15th. Pandora said it now plans to sell about 14.68 million shares at a proposed price range of $10-$12 per share. The company had previously offered to sell 13.68 million shares at a price range of $7-$9 per share. The total value of the deal could reach about $176 million at the high end of its price range. The pricing of the stock puts Pandora’s valuation suggesting a total value of $1.94 billion at high end. The company, which has yet to turn a profit, first filed to go public in February. At the time, Pandora expected to raise $100 million. The steady increases are a sign that the IPO’s underwriters — Citigroup, Morgan Stanley, and JP Morgan Chase are the leaders, anticipate heavy demand for the company’s shares. The company expects to trade under the ticker symbol “P” on the New York Stock Exchange.

    About Pandora

    Pandora Radio is an internet radio service, recommendation service, and the custodian of the Music Genome Project. Users enter a song or artist that they enjoy, and the service responds by playing selections that are musically similar. Users provide feedback on approval or disapproval of individual songs, which Pandora takes into account for future selections. While listening, users are offered the ability to buy the songs or albums at various online retailers. As part of the Music Genome Project, over 400 different musical attributes are considered when selecting the next song. These 400 attributes are combined into larger groups called focus traits. There are 2,000 focus traits. Examples of these are rhythm syncopation, key tonality, vocal harmonies, and displayed instrumental proficiency.

    The Music Genome Project is what powers Pandora’s personalization, as it is a detailed, hand-built musical taxonomy. Using this musicological “DNA” and constant listener feedback Pandora crafts personalized stations from the more than 800,000 songs that have been analyzed since the project began in January 2000. More than 75 million people throughout the United States listen to personalized radio stations for free on Pandora through their PCs, mobile phones and devices such as the iPad, and connected in-house devices ranging from TVs to set-top boxes to Blu-Ray players. Mobile technology has been a significant factor in the growth and popularity of Pandora, starting with the introduction of the Apple app store for the iPhone in the Summer of 2008. Pandora instantly became one of the most top downloaded apps and today, according to Nielsen, is one of the top five most popular apps across all smart-phone platforms. Pandora is mostly free and, thanks to connectivity, available everywhere consumers are – at the office, at home, in the car and all points in between.

    In 2009 the Company announced that Pandora would be incorporated into the dashboard in Ford cars via SYNC technology; GM has already followed in announcing plans to integrate Pandora into its vehicles’ OnStar system. Since more than 50% of radio listening happens in the car, this was a crucial arena for Pandora.

    The Oakland, Calif., company’s business is growing fast, averaging a new user every second. As of last April, Pandora had 90 million registered members, up from 80 million in February. Those members racked up 3.8 billion hours of listening to Pandora’s song stream last year. Founded in 2000 as the Music Genome Project, Pandora uses algorithms and user feedback to generate music recommendations for its listeners. The company claims a 50% share of all Internet radio listening time among the top 20 stations and networks in the United States, according to a November 2010 report by audience measurement firm Ando Media. Pandora offers listeners two options: A free, advertising-supported stream or a “premium” plan priced at $36 per year, which offers higher audio quality and no ads. Most of its revenue base comes from advertising. Revenue surged 150% to reach $137.7 million in the fiscal year ended Jan. 31, 2011. Net losses fell to $1.76 million from $16.7 million the previous year. Due to copyright and licensing rulings, Pandora is only available in the United States, but Pandora has said that it has plans to extend its service to a global market.

    Financials

    Revenue for the 9 months ended October 31, 2010 was $90.12 million. That’s an increase over 30.1 million over the same months in 2009. Net income in the first 9 months of 2010 was…a loss of $328,000. Pandora lost $18 million during the same months in 2009. During the first nine months of 2010, Pandora ad revenue reached $78 million. That’s up from $29 million during the same period in 2009. That’s huge growth. Subscription revenue was $12.3 million during the first 9 months of 2010. It was $4 million during the first 9 months of 2009. That’s huge growth.

    Increasing Expense & Risk – “Royalties”

    Pandora paid out 49% of its revenue to license the music it sends to listeners via its customized, online radio channels. Even more important, the key royalty rates that the still-unprofitable company pays to artists and music publishers are set to rise significantly during the next four years. Pandora agreed to give up the greater of 25% percent of its annual revenue, or another aggregate amount based on a royalty rate charged each time Pandora plays a copyrighted song. Pandora is consistently paying about half its revenue in license fees, or nearly double the 25% figure that was part of the agreement, provides a pretty clear indication of which party got a better deal. What’s worse for Pandora (and, soon, for its public shareholders) is that the rate for its license, known as a “pure-play license,” is calculated based on a sliding scale that jumps substantially over time.

    For 2011, Pandora pays a per-performance rate of $0.00102 for songs played on its non-subscription service. That service, by the way, generated 86% of the company’s revenue for the nine months ended Oct. 31, 2010, according the company’s initial S-1 regulatory filing. By 2015, the rate goes up by more than a third, or 37%, to $0.00140 per performance. For music played on Pandora’s subscription service, which generated the other 14% of revenue during those same nine months, the company is paying a per-performance rate of $0.0017 in 2011. By 2015, that rate jumps a whopping 47%, to $0.0025. And, as Pandora itself says in its S-1 document, the company gets no volume discount on royalty fees. In other words, the more it plays, the more it pays. And those are not all the royalty fees that Pandora has to pay. It also has an agreement with the music publishing organization BMI that causes it to fork over another 1.75% of its “gross revenue,” and another with a similar group, known as SESAC, that pays out 0.38% of gross revenue.

    Pandora detailed in its S-1, the company paid 48% of its revenue to acquire content. It clearly states that the company is at a disadvantage to its non-Internet rivals because “unlike traditional radio broadcasters, they must pay performance rights royalties for the digital audio transmission of sound recordings …”  The company’s S-1 filing also says this: “As a result of these (several) factors, we expect to continue to incur operating losses on an annual basis through at least the end of fiscal 2012.” When the company expects to be profitable, the prospectus doesn’t say. How it will pull that off while its biggest expense is rising by at least a third during the next four years is also a mystery. They will need the extra cash to continue the huge run-up in top line revenue growth that they are getting basically from advertising revenue.

    Competition

    Pandora’s increased IPO price also comes as competition is growing for how people listen to music. Earlier this week, Apple unveiled a digital-music service that will allow users to remotely access their songs. Meanwhile, Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN) and Google Inc. (GOOG) also offer similar products. Pandora admits in its filing that the three companies and Facebook pose a significant threat if they were to develop a competing Internet radio platform, because they likely would have advantages in resources, technology and services. For now, though, Pandora has a strong head start. According to a September 2010 report by Nielsen, a media measurement firm, the Pandora app is a top-five-most-used app across all four major smartphone platforms in the U.S.; in January, the Pandora app was the No. 2 all-time downloaded free iPhone app and the No. 1 all-time downloaded free iPad app, according to Apple.

    Beneficiaries

    Employees and investors who stuck with Pandora will be the biggest beneficiaries of the IPO. That’s because 8.68 million of the 14.68 million shares that Pandora now expects to sell in its offering are being sold by existing shareholders, which means most of the money raised in the offering will go into private hands, rather than onto the company’s balance sheet.

    Here’s the full ownership table:

    Pandora Shareholders